{"id":282,"date":"2016-07-04T18:21:30","date_gmt":"2016-07-04T15:21:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ozmeric.av.tr\/?p=282"},"modified":"2016-07-04T18:23:44","modified_gmt":"2016-07-04T15:23:44","slug":"karsiliksizceklericin-tekraradliparacezasiduzenlemesigeliyor","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/ozmeric.av.tr\/index.php\/2016\/07\/04\/karsiliksizceklericin-tekraradliparacezasiduzenlemesigeliyor\/","title":{"rendered":"KAR\u015eILIKSIZ \u00c7EKLER \u0130\u00c7\u0130N TEKRAR ADL\u0130 PARA CEZASI D\u00dcZENLEMES\u0130 GEL\u0130YOR!"},"content":{"rendered":"

KAR\u015eILIKSIZ \u00c7EKLER \u0130\u00c7\u0130N <\/strong><\/p>\n

TEKRAR ADL\u0130 PARA CEZASI D\u00dcZENLEMES\u0130 GEL\u0130YOR!<\/strong><\/p>\n

Av.Merve Ay\u00e7e \u00d6ZMER\u0130\u00c7<\/strong><\/p>\n

Temmuz, 2016<\/strong><\/p>\n

2009 y\u0131l\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckten kalkan 3167 say\u0131l\u0131 \u00c7ek Kanunu\u2019nun md.16 d\u00fczenlemesine g\u00f6re, kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131ks\u0131z \u00e7ek ke\u015fide etmek su\u00e7 olarak d\u00fczenlenmi\u015fti ve bu d\u00fczenleme uyar\u0131nca kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131ks\u0131z \u00e7ek ke\u015fide edenler, \u00e7ek \u00f6demesini yapmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 oranda adli para cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131l\u0131yorlard\u0131. \u00d6rnek olarak alacakl\u0131s\u0131na 50.000-TL bedelli bir \u00e7ek ke\u015fide eden \u015firket yetkilisi \u00e7ek bedelini \u00f6demedi\u011fi halde, hamilin \u015fik\u00e2yeti neticesinde \u00e7ek borcundan ayr\u0131 olarak 50.000-TL adli para cezas\u0131na mahk\u00fbm edilebiliyordu. Bu halde hakk\u0131nda adli para cezas\u0131 verilmesini \u00f6nlemek isteyen \u00e7ek ke\u015fidecileri, alacakl\u0131 ile anla\u015farak ve \u00e7ek borcunu \u00f6deyerek, alacakl\u0131n\u0131n \u015fik\u00e2yetini geri almas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011fl\u0131yordu. Ku\u015fkusuz bu d\u00fczenleme \u00e7ek alacakl\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n lehine idi. Bu d\u00fczenlemeye g\u00f6re \u00e7eki ke\u015fide eden \u00fczerinde borcu \u00f6demek i\u00e7in bir bask\u0131 arac\u0131 s\u00f6z konusu idi. Ancak bu d\u00fczenleme, para borcu sebebiyle ki\u015filerin hapis cezas\u0131na mahkum olmas\u0131na sebebiyet vermekle beraber, bu a\u015famada yarg\u0131 mercilerinde kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131ks\u0131z \u00e7ek dosyalar\u0131nda b\u00fcy\u00fck bir art\u0131\u015f ya\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi cezaevlerindeki doluluk oran\u0131nda art\u0131\u015flar\u0131n ya\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir. Netice itibari ile 5941 say\u0131l\u0131 \u00c7ek Kanunu (6273 say\u0131l\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fiklik kanunu ile) kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131ks\u0131z \u00e7ek ke\u015fide etme fiili i\u00e7in adli para cezas\u0131 d\u00fczenlemesi ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Ancak yasal d\u00fczenleme sonras\u0131 ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre\u00e7te, \u00e7ek hamili alacakl\u0131lar\u0131n ma\u011fduriyetlerinin artt\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00e7ekin ticari hayattaki i\u015flevselli\u011fini kaybetti\u011fi, \u00e7eklerin tahsilinin g\u00fc\u00e7le\u015fti\u011fi g\u00f6zlenmi\u015ftir. Keza ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde iflas\u0131n ertelenmesi kurumunun k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, alacakl\u0131lar\u0131n alaca\u011f\u0131n tahsilinde zorluklar ya\u015famas\u0131na sebebiyet verdi\u011fi g\u00f6zlemlenmi\u015ftir. T\u00fcm bu olumsuzluklar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirme sonras\u0131 Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019nca haz\u0131rlanan 24. 06.2016 tarihli 2697 say\u0131l\u0131 tasar\u0131 \u201cYat\u0131r\u0131m Ortam\u0131n\u0131n \u0130yile\u015ftirilmesi Amac\u0131yla Baz\u0131 Kanunlarda De\u011fi\u015fiklik Yap\u0131lmas\u0131na Dair Kanun Tasar\u0131s\u0131\u201d meclise sunmu\u015ftur. S\u00f6z konusu tasar\u0131da iflas\u0131n ertelenmesi kurumuna ili\u015fkin \u00e7e\u015fitli de\u011fi\u015fiklikler \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc gibi, kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131ks\u0131z \u00e7ek ke\u015fide etmek tekrar su\u00e7 olarak d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir ve sermaye \u015firketlerinin kurulu\u015f masraflar\u0131n\u0131n azalt\u0131lmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik benzeri d\u00fczenlemelere yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Tasar\u0131da, 5941 say\u0131l\u0131 \u00c7ek Kanunu\u2019nda \u00f6nemli de\u011fi\u015fiklikler yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6rmekteyiz. Bankalar \u00f6ncelikle \u00e7ek ke\u015fidecisi hakk\u0131nda adli sicil kayd\u0131 talep edecektir. Bununla beraber, Bankalar \u00e7ek defteri talep eden ki\u015fi hakk\u0131nda \u00e7ek hesab\u0131 a\u00e7ma ve \u00e7ek d\u00fczenleme yasa\u011f\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kontrol edeceklerdir. \u00d6zellikle vade tarihinden \u00f6nce ke\u015fide edilen \u00e7eklerin takibi amac\u0131yla \u00e7ek hamilerine karek\u00f6k sistemine \u00e7eki kaydetme ve k\u0131smen \u00e7ek ke\u015fidecisi ve \u00e7ekleri hakk\u0131nda bilgi sahibi olma imkan\u0131 tan\u0131n\u0131yor. Hamillerin elinde bulunan \u00e7eki karek\u00f6k sistemine kaydetmemeleri halinde Bankan\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k \u00e7ek yapra\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in \u00f6deme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc sona eriyor. Tasar\u0131ya g\u00f6re bu d\u00fczenlemenin 2017 y\u0131l\u0131 sonunda y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmesi bekleniyor.<\/p>\n

Kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k \u00e7ek ke\u015fideci etmek fiiline ili\u015fkin adli para cezas\u0131 hakk\u0131ndaki d\u00fczenleme ise, 3167 say\u0131l\u0131 \u00c7ek Kanunun eski d\u00fczenlemesine paralel \u015fekildedir. Tasar\u0131ya g\u00f6re kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131ks\u0131z \u00e7ek d\u00fczenleyen ki\u015filer 1500 g\u00fcn ve \u00e7ekin \u00f6denmeyen k\u0131sm\u0131ndan az olmamak \u00fczere adli para cezas\u0131na mahk\u00fbm olacaklard\u0131r. Ke\u015fideci hakk\u0131nda kesinle\u015fmi\u015f adli para cezas\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fcne ra\u011fmen, ke\u015fideci \u00e7ek bedelini ticari faizi ile \u00f6deyerek hakk\u0131ndaki cezay\u0131 ve neticeleri ortadan kald\u0131rma imk\u00e2n\u0131na sahiptir. Kesinle\u015fmi\u015f adli para cezas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmemesi halinde, bu ceza hapis cezas\u0131 olarak infaz edilecektir. Bununla beraber, Mahkeme yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda koruyucu tedbir olarak \u00e7ek hesab\u0131 a\u00e7ma ve \u00e7ek d\u00fczenleme yasa\u011f\u0131 karar\u0131 vermek yetkisine sahip olacakt\u0131r. Eski d\u00fczenlemede bu yarg\u0131lama Asliye Ceza Mahkemeleri\u2019nin yetkisinde iken, tasar\u0131 ile \u0130cra Ceza Mahkemelerinin yetkili k\u0131l\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6rmekteyiz.<\/p>\n

\u015eu hususu da belirtmekte fayda vard\u0131r ki, tasar\u0131n\u0131n yasala\u015fmas\u0131 halinde kanunun y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fck tarihinden \u00f6nce ke\u015fide edilen \u00e7eklere etkisi oldu\u011fu s\u00f6yleme imk\u00e2n\u0131 bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Tasar\u0131n\u0131n yasala\u015fmas\u0131 halinde, \u00e7ekin \u00f6deme vas\u0131tas\u0131 olarak ticari hayattaki \u00f6neminin artaca\u011f\u0131 muhakkakt\u0131r. \u00d6nceki yasal d\u00fczenlemede oldu\u011fu gibi alacakl\u0131lar \u00e7ekin kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131ks\u0131z kalmas\u0131 halinde icra takibi, ihtiyati haciz ve haciz yollar\u0131ndan ba\u015fka su\u00e7a ili\u015fkin \u015fik\u00e2yet hakk\u0131na sahip olacakt\u0131r. Tasar\u0131da yer alan yeniliklerin bor\u00e7lular bak\u0131m\u0131ndan aleyhe d\u00fczenleme niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fu, mali a\u00e7maza giren ki\u015filerin \u00e7ekleri \u00f6deyememesinden \u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fc adli para cezas\u0131na ve neticeden bu adli para cezas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmemesi halinde hapis cezas\u0131na mahk\u00fbm olmas\u0131na sebebiyet verecek olmas\u0131 da de\u011ferlendirilmelidir.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

KAR\u015eILIKSIZ \u00c7EKLER \u0130\u00c7\u0130N TEKRAR ADL\u0130 PARA CEZASI D\u00dcZENLEMES\u0130 GEL\u0130YOR! Av.Merve Ay\u00e7e \u00d6ZMER\u0130\u00c7 Temmuz, 2016 2009 y\u0131l\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckten kalkan 3167 say\u0131l\u0131 \u00c7ek Kanunu\u2019nun md.16 d\u00fczenlemesine g\u00f6re, kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131ks\u0131z \u00e7ek ke\u015fide etmek su\u00e7 olarak d\u00fczenlenmi\u015fti ve bu d\u00fczenleme uyar\u0131nca kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131ks\u0131z \u00e7ek ke\u015fide edenler, \u00e7ek \u00f6demesini yapmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 oranda adli para cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131l\u0131yorlard\u0131. \u00d6rnek olarak alacakl\u0131s\u0131na 50.000-TL bedelli bir \u00e7ek ke\u015fide eden \u015firket yetkilisi \u00e7ek bedelini \u00f6demedi\u011fi halde, hamilin \u015fik\u00e2yeti neticesinde \u00e7ek borcundan ayr\u0131 olarak 50.000-TL adli para cezas\u0131na mahk\u00fbm edilebiliyordu. Bu halde hakk\u0131nda adli para cezas\u0131 verilmesini \u00f6nlemek isteyen \u00e7ek ke\u015fidecileri, alacakl\u0131 ile anla\u015farak ve \u00e7ek borcunu \u00f6deyerek, alacakl\u0131n\u0131n \u015fik\u00e2yetini geri almas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011fl\u0131yordu. Ku\u015fkusuz bu d\u00fczenleme \u00e7ek alacakl\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n lehine idi. Bu d\u00fczenlemeye g\u00f6re \u00e7eki ke\u015fide eden \u00fczerinde borcu \u00f6demek i\u00e7in bir bask\u0131 arac\u0131 s\u00f6z konusu idi. Ancak bu d\u00fczenleme, para borcu sebebiyle ki\u015filerin hapis cezas\u0131na mahkum olmas\u0131na sebebiyet vermekle beraber, bu a\u015famada yarg\u0131 mercilerinde kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131ks\u0131z \u00e7ek dosyalar\u0131nda b\u00fcy\u00fck bir art\u0131\u015f ya\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi cezaevlerindeki doluluk oran\u0131nda art\u0131\u015flar\u0131n ya\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir. Netice itibari ile 5941 say\u0131l\u0131 \u00c7ek Kanunu (6273 say\u0131l\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fiklik kanunu ile) kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131ks\u0131z \u00e7ek ke\u015fide etme fiili i\u00e7in adli para cezas\u0131 d\u00fczenlemesi ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ancak yasal d\u00fczenleme sonras\u0131 ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre\u00e7te, \u00e7ek hamili alacakl\u0131lar\u0131n ma\u011fduriyetlerinin artt\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00e7ekin ticari hayattaki i\u015flevselli\u011fini kaybetti\u011fi, \u00e7eklerin tahsilinin g\u00fc\u00e7le\u015fti\u011fi g\u00f6zlenmi\u015ftir. Keza […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":286,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[5],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/ozmeric.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/282"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/ozmeric.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/ozmeric.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ozmeric.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ozmeric.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=282"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/ozmeric.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/282\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":285,"href":"http:\/\/ozmeric.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/282\/revisions\/285"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ozmeric.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/286"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/ozmeric.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=282"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ozmeric.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=282"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ozmeric.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=282"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}