{"id":315,"date":"2017-02-08T19:25:02","date_gmt":"2017-02-08T17:25:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ozmeric.av.tr\/?p=315"},"modified":"2017-02-08T19:26:23","modified_gmt":"2017-02-08T17:26:23","slug":"insaat-sozlesmelerinde-hak-ve-alacaklar-bakimindan-ispat-yukumlulugu","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/ozmeric.av.tr\/index.php\/2017\/02\/08\/insaat-sozlesmelerinde-hak-ve-alacaklar-bakimindan-ispat-yukumlulugu\/","title":{"rendered":"\u0130N\u015eAAT S\u00d6ZLE\u015eMELER\u0130NDE HAK VE ALACAKLAR BAKIMINDAN \u0130SPAT Y\u00dcK\u00dcML\u00dcL\u00dc\u011e\u00dc"},"content":{"rendered":"

\u0130N\u015eAAT S\u00d6ZLE\u015eMELER\u0130NDE HAK VE ALACAKLAR BAKIMINDAN <\/strong><\/p>\n

\u0130SPAT Y\u00dcK\u00dcML\u00dcL\u00dc\u011e\u00dc<\/strong><\/p>\n

Eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin unsurlar\u0131 818 say\u0131l\u0131 Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu’na g\u00f6re bir \u015fey imali; 6098 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu’na g\u00f6re bir eser meydana getirme, eser ve i\u015f bedelidir.<\/p>\n

Uygulamada eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri kar\u015f\u0131m\u0131za daha \u00e7ok in\u015faat s\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri olarak kar\u015f\u0131m\u0131za \u00e7\u0131kmaktad\u0131r. Bu a\u015famada gerek i\u015f sahipleri ile y\u00fckleniciler, gerekse y\u00fckleniciler ve alt y\u00fckleniciler aras\u0131nda eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri akdedilmektedir. Nihayetinde bir binan\u0131n yap\u0131m a\u015famas\u0131nda farkl\u0131 ki\u015filerin taraf oldu\u011fu ve farkl\u0131 edimlerden olu\u015fan (temel in\u015faat\u0131, kaz\u0131 i\u015fleri, bina in\u015fas\u0131, elektrik, su tesisat\u0131 yap\u0131m\u0131, asans\u00f6r imali, dairelerin mutfak ve banyolar\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131m\u0131, bah\u00e7e d\u00fczenlemesi vb. konularda) bir\u00e7ok eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi yap\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinde taraflar aras\u0131nda \u00e7o\u011fu kez; s\u00f6zle\u015fme konusu i\u015f, \u00a0y\u00fcklenicinin yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015fin ve alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n miktar\u0131, \u00f6demeler, teslim konusunda ihtilaflar ya\u015fanmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamdaki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131n Yarg\u0131 mercileri \u00f6n\u00fcnde \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fclmesinde ispat kurallar\u0131 aktif rol oynamaktad\u0131r. Bu sebeple bu yaz\u0131m\u0131zda in\u015faat s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinden kaynaklanan hak ve alacaklar\u0131n belirlenmesinde kilit nokta olarak nitelendirilebilecek ispat kurallar\u0131na yer verilecektir.<\/p>\n

\u00d6rnek olarak y\u00fcklenici a\u00e7m\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu davada i\u015fi bitirdi\u011fini iddia ederek i\u015f sahibinden alacak talebinde bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinde kural olarak y\u00fcklenicinin i\u015f bedeline hak kazanabilmesi i\u00e7in eseri s\u00f6zle\u015fme ve ekleri, imar mevzuat\u0131, fen ve tekni\u011fine uygun olarak tamamlay\u0131p i\u015f sahibine teslim etmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay \u00d6zel Dairesi, eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden kaynaklanan uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klarda y\u00fcklenicinin yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu i\u015f metraj ve miktar\u0131n\u0131 ispat ile, i\u015f sahibinin ise \u00f6demeleri ispat ile m\u00fckellef oldu\u011funu kararlar\u0131nda \u00e7o\u011fu kez vurgulamaktad\u0131r[1]<\/sup><\/sup><\/a>. Bu kapsamda yine y\u00fcklenici, eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin fesih tarihine kadar yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu i\u015fin kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 olan bedeli isteme hakk\u0131na sahiptir. \u0130\u015f tamamlanmadan s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin fesih edilmesi ya da y\u00fcklenicinin i\u015fi terk etmesi halinde yap\u0131lan k\u0131sm\u0131n i\u015f sahibinin yarar\u0131na ve kullan\u0131labilir olmas\u0131 ko\u015fuluyla bedeli, s\u00f6zle\u015fme fiyatlar\u0131yla hesaplanacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Bununla beraber eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinin teslimin b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmekte faydal\u0131 olacakt\u0131r. Zira y\u00fcklenici gerek Kanun gerekse s\u00f6zle\u015fmede yer alan \u015fartlar d\u00e2hilinde ge\u00e7 teslimden sorumlu olacakt\u0131r. Baz\u0131 uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klarda i\u015f sahibi i\u015fin teslim edilmedi\u011fi iddia etmekte, y\u00fcklenici ise i\u015fi teslim etti\u011fini savunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinde teslimin, y\u00fcklenicinin tamamlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 eseri s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyi ifa etmek niyeti ile i\u015f sahibinin fiili h\u00e2kimiyetine ge\u00e7irmesi olarak tan\u0131mland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6rmekteyiz. Eserin teslim edilip edilmedi\u011finin ispat\u0131nda, taraflar\u0131n hangi delillerle yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 hususunda s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye h\u00fck\u00fcm koyabilirler ve teslim konusunda bir delil s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi yapabilirler. Ancak b\u00f6yle bir delil s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi yoksa y\u00fcklenicinin meydana getirdi\u011fi eseri teslim etti\u011fi vak\u0131as\u0131n\u0131, teslim; hukuki i\u015flem de\u011fil, hukuki fiil oldu\u011fundan kural olarak her t\u00fcr kan\u0131tla bu arada tan\u0131kla dahi ispat edebilir.<\/p>\n

Yine i\u015f sahibi y\u00fckleniciye kar\u015f\u0131 olan iddialar\u0131nda, s\u00f6zle\u015fme konusu i\u015fin y\u00fcklenici taraf\u0131ndan de\u011fil de, 3. ki\u015fi\/ki\u015filer taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrebilmektedir. Yarg\u0131tay kararlar\u0131nda belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere, \u00a0taraflar aras\u0131nda ge\u00e7erli bir eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 halinde, i\u015fin ba\u015fkas\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 bu kerre i\u015f sahibi taraf\u0131ndan yasal delillerle ispatlanmal\u0131d\u0131r[2]<\/sup><\/sup><\/a>.<\/p>\n

Netice itibari ile in\u015faat s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinde ispat kurallar\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan \u015fu sonu\u00e7lara var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r:<\/strong><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. \u0130n\u015faat s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinde y\u00fcklenicinin bedele hak kazanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in i\u015fi mevzuata ve s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye g\u00f6re bitirip i\u015f sahibine teslim etmesi gerekmektedir. Bununla beraber, i\u015fin k\u0131smi olarak yap\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde y\u00fcklenici yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 k\u0131s\u0131m ile orant\u0131l\u0131 olarak s\u00f6zle\u015fmede belirlenen \u00fccrete g\u00f6re talep hakk\u0131na sahip olacakt\u0131r. Burada art\u0131 parantez olarak yap\u0131lan k\u0131sm\u0131n i\u015f sahibinin yarar\u0131na ve kullan\u0131labilir olmas\u0131n\u0131n gereklili\u011fini belirtelim.<\/li>\n
  2. Y\u00fcklenicinin ise i\u015fi yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ispat ile m\u00fckellef olmakla beraber, i\u015f sahibi ise \u00f6demelerini ispat ile m\u00fckelleftir.<\/li>\n
  3. Taraflar aras\u0131nda ge\u00e7erli bir eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin mevcut olmas\u0131 halinde i\u015fin y\u00fcklenici de\u011fil de, ba\u015fkas\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddia ediliyorsa ispat y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc i\u015f sahibine ait olacakt\u0131r.<\/li>\n
  4. Teslime ili\u015fkin uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klarda, teslim olgusunun y\u00fcklenici taraf\u0131ndan ispat edilmesi gerekmekte olup, her t\u00fcrl\u00fc ispat vas\u0131tas\u0131na olanak tan\u0131nmaktad\u0131r.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

     <\/p>\n

    Yazan: Av.Merve Ay\u00e7e \u00d6ZMER\u0130\u00c7, 08.02.2017<\/p>\n

    \n

    \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

    [1]<\/a> Yarg\u0131tay 15. Hukuk Dairesi E. 2013\/6122 K. 2014\/4164 T. 17.6.2014 karar\u0131ndan al\u0131nt\u0131d\u0131r: \u201cDavac\u0131 ta\u015feron ile daval\u0131 y\u00fcklenici \u015firket aras\u0131nda imzalanan 22.11.2010 tarihli s\u00f6zle\u015fme, s\u00f6zle\u015fme ve dava tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 818 say\u0131l\u0131 Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu’nun 355 ve devam\u0131 maddelerinde d\u00fczenlenen eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi niteli\u011findedir. Kural olarak yap\u0131lan i\u015fin miktar ve de\u011ferini ispat y\u00fck\u00fc y\u00fcklenicide, i\u015f bedelinin \u00f6dendi\u011fini ispat y\u00fck\u00fc ise i\u015f sahibindedir. Bir ba\u015fka deyi\u015fle y\u00fcklenici yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015fin tutar\u0131n\u0131, i\u015f sahibi de i\u015f bedelini \u00f6dedi\u011fini kan\u0131tlamak zorundad\u0131r. Somut olay\u0131m\u0131za gelince; taraflar aras\u0131nda i\u015fin eksik b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 konusunda bir uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k yoktur. Davac\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 imal\u00e2t tutar\u0131n\u0131 kan\u0131tlamak zorunda olup, d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f ise hakedi\u015f belgeleri ve tan\u0131k anlat\u0131mlar\u0131 ile davac\u0131n\u0131n yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 imal\u00e2t bedeli s\u00f6zle\u015fme fiyatlar\u0131 ile belirlenmeli, bu konuda mahkemenin ve Yarg\u0131tay’\u0131n denetimine elveri\u015fli \u015fekilde ek rapor al\u0131nmal\u0131 ve bundan sonra da daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan kan\u0131tlanan ve davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan kabul edilen \u00f6demelerin mahsup edilerek bulunan i\u015f bedeline h\u00fckmedilmesi gerekirken eksik inceleme ve de\u011ferlendirme ile h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 do\u011fru olmam\u0131\u015f, h\u00fckm\u00fcn bu nedenlerle bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir.\u201d<\/p>\n

    Yarg\u0131tay 15. Hukuk Dairesi E. 2013\/6153 K. 2014\/4556 T. 27.6.2014 karar\u0131 ile \u015fu \u015fekilde ifade edilmi\u015ftir: \u201cYanlar aras\u0131ndaki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n i\u015f bedeli ve \u00f6demeler konusunda topland\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. MK’n\u0131n 6. ve HMK’n\u0131n 190. maddelerine g\u00f6re yap\u0131lan i\u015flerin miktar ve metraj\u0131yla bedelini ispatlamak davac\u0131 ta\u015ferona, para ve malzeme vermek suretiyle yap\u0131lan \u00f6demeleri ispat etmek ise daval\u0131 y\u00fckleniciye aittir.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

    [2]<\/a> T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 15. Hukuk Dairesi E. 2015\/829 K. 2015\/6452 T. 16.12.2015 karar\u0131ndan al\u0131nt\u0131d\u0131r: \u201cDava s\u00f6zle\u015fme ve takip tarihine g\u00f6re uygulanmas\u0131 gereken 818 say\u0131l\u0131 m\u00fclga Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu 355 vd. maddelerde d\u00fczenlenen eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden do\u011fan alaca\u011fa ili\u015fkin yap\u0131lan takibe itiraz nedeniyle 2004 say\u0131 \u0130cra \u0130flas Kanunu 67. maddeye g\u00f6re a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f itiraz\u0131n iptali davas\u0131d\u0131r. Eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi, y\u00fcklenicinin bir eser meydana getirmeyi, i\u015fsahibinin de bunun kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bir bedel \u00f6demeyi \u00fcstlendi\u011fi s\u00f6zle\u015fmedir. Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye g\u00f6re davac\u0131 y\u00fcklenici daval\u0131 i\u015f sahibidir. Eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinde kural olarak davac\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fme ve yasaya uygun ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi imal\u00e2t miktar\u0131n\u0131, daval\u0131 ise yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6demeleri kan\u0131tlamakla y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr. S\u00f6zle\u015fme ayakta ve i\u015f tamamlanm\u0131\u015f ise i\u015fin s\u00f6zle\u015fme ili\u015fkisi devam eden y\u00fcklenici taraf\u0131ndan tamamland\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilir. Ama aksini kan\u0131tlayan ikrar niteli\u011finde beyan var ise bu beyan esas al\u0131nmal\u0131d\u0131r. \u015eayet, im\u00e2l edilen eserde ay\u0131p varsa, i\u015f sahibi taraf\u0131ndan s\u00fcresi i\u00e7erisinde ay\u0131p ihbar\u0131nda bulunulmas\u0131 \u015fart\u0131yla BK’n\u0131n 360. maddesinde say\u0131lan se\u00e7imlik haklar\u0131ndan birisini kullanabilir. Bu hakk\u0131n kullanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in i\u015f sahibi taraf\u0131ndan ayr\u0131 bir dava a\u00e7\u0131labilece\u011fi gibi, y\u00fcklenici taraf\u0131ndan aleyhine a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olan bir davada da bu hususu def’i olarak ileri s\u00fcrebilir. Ay\u0131p eserde olmas\u0131 gereken l\u00fczumlu vas\u0131flar\u0131n veya s\u00f6zle\u015fmede kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lan vas\u0131flar\u0131n eksikli\u011fini ifade etmektedir. 818 say\u0131l\u0131 BK’n\u0131n 359\/I. maddesine g\u00f6re i\u015f sahibinin eserin tesliminden sonra i\u015flerin ola\u011fan ak\u0131\u015f\u0131na g\u00f6re ge\u00e7 say\u0131lmayacak bir s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde eseri muayene edip varsa ay\u0131plar\u0131n\u0131 y\u00fckleniciye bildirmesi gerekir. BK’n\u0131n 359\/1. maddesine g\u00f6re a\u00e7\u0131k ay\u0131plarda bildirimin “i\u015flerin mutad cereyan\u0131na g\u00f6re imkan\u0131n\u0131 bulur bulmaz” di\u011fer bir ifadeyle i\u015flerin ola\u011fan ak\u0131\u015f\u0131na g\u00f6re ge\u00e7 say\u0131lmayacak bir s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde, 818 say\u0131l\u0131 BK’n\u0131n 362\/3. maddesine g\u00f6re gizli ay\u0131plarda ise gizli ay\u0131ba vak\u0131f olur olmaz (\u00f6\u011frenir \u00f6\u011frenmez) yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

    Bu ilke ve kurallar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda somut olaya gelindi\u011finde; daval\u0131n\u0131n icra dosyas\u0131na verdi\u011fi itiraz dilek\u00e7esi ve davaya cevap dilek\u00e7esinde teknede yap\u0131lan boya ve macun i\u015flerindeki ay\u0131pl\u0131 ve eksik i\u015flerin kendileri taraf\u0131ndan s\u00f6kt\u00fcr\u00fclerek \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filere yapt\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etti\u011finden teslim olgusu kan\u0131tlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu nedenle teslim olgusunun ispat\u0131 i\u00e7in ke\u015fif yap\u0131lmas\u0131na gerek bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Davac\u0131 taraf\u00e7a teslimden sonra ay\u0131p ihbar\u0131nda bulunuldu\u011fu yasal delillerle ispatlanamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ancak davac\u0131, daval\u0131 i\u015f sahibine g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi 19.09.2011 ile 23.09.2011 tarihli e-maillerde son kat boya hari\u00e7 di\u011fer i\u015fleri yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etmekle son kat boya i\u015finin eksik yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kabul etmi\u015ftir. Boya i\u015fi ile ilgili s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye g\u00f6re son kat boya yap\u0131lmamas\u0131 nedeniyle, davac\u0131n\u0131n haketti\u011fi boya i\u015finden imal\u00e2t bedeli konusunda davac\u0131n\u0131n kabul etti\u011fi boya i\u015findeki eksi\u011fin %20 oranda olabilece\u011fine dair beyan\u0131 da dikkate al\u0131narak haketti\u011fi i\u015f bedeli teknik bilirki\u015fiye hesaplatt\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p di\u011fer i\u015flerle ilgili s\u00f6zle\u015fmedeki i\u015f bedelinin tamam\u0131na hak kazand\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilerek bu suretle hakedilen toplam i\u015f bedelinin hesaplatt\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131, bundan taraflar aras\u0131nda ihtilafl\u0131 olmayan 27.794,00 TL \u00e7ekle \u00f6deme d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp daval\u0131 defterlerinde 01.08.2011 tarih 2.248,00 yevmiye no ile \u201cS. E. hesab\u0131ndan\u201d a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 ile yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen 3.000,00 TL ve 1.200,00 TL olmak \u00fczere toplam 4.200,00 TL \u00f6demeye ili\u015fkin dayanak belge bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu \u00f6demelerin davac\u0131ya yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p sonucuna g\u00f6re bu miktar\u0131n hakedilen bedelden d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fclmedi\u011fi ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p sonucuna g\u00f6re karar vermek gerekirken davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesi do\u011fru olmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/em><\/p>\n

    T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 15. Hukuk Dairesi E. 2007\/3010 K. 2008\/2636 T. 21.4.2008 karar\u0131ndan al\u0131nt\u0131d\u0131r:\u201c\u0130malat\u0131n yap\u0131larak yerine tak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, ke\u015fif yap\u0131larak saptanm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131na g\u00f6re; s\u00f6zle\u015fme konusu i\u015fin y\u00fcklenici taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funun kabul\u00fc gerekir. Bu karinenin aksi, davac\u0131 i\u015f-eser sahibi taraf\u0131ndan yasal delillerle kan\u0131tlanamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. A\u00e7\u0131klanan bu hukuksal sebeplerle mahkemece davan\u0131n reddi gerekirken; kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi do\u011fru olmam\u0131\u015f, karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    \u0130N\u015eAAT S\u00d6ZLE\u015eMELER\u0130NDE HAK VE ALACAKLAR BAKIMINDAN \u0130SPAT Y\u00dcK\u00dcML\u00dcL\u00dc\u011e\u00dc Eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin unsurlar\u0131 818 say\u0131l\u0131 Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu’na g\u00f6re bir \u015fey imali; 6098 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu’na g\u00f6re bir eser meydana getirme, eser ve i\u015f bedelidir. Uygulamada eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri kar\u015f\u0131m\u0131za daha \u00e7ok in\u015faat s\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri olarak kar\u015f\u0131m\u0131za \u00e7\u0131kmaktad\u0131r. Bu a\u015famada gerek i\u015f sahipleri ile y\u00fckleniciler, gerekse y\u00fckleniciler ve alt y\u00fckleniciler aras\u0131nda eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri akdedilmektedir. Nihayetinde bir binan\u0131n yap\u0131m a\u015famas\u0131nda farkl\u0131 ki\u015filerin taraf oldu\u011fu ve farkl\u0131 edimlerden olu\u015fan (temel in\u015faat\u0131, kaz\u0131 i\u015fleri, bina in\u015fas\u0131, elektrik, su tesisat\u0131 yap\u0131m\u0131, asans\u00f6r imali, dairelerin mutfak ve banyolar\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131m\u0131, bah\u00e7e d\u00fczenlemesi vb. konularda) bir\u00e7ok eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi yap\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinde taraflar aras\u0131nda \u00e7o\u011fu kez; s\u00f6zle\u015fme konusu i\u015f, \u00a0y\u00fcklenicinin yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015fin ve alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n miktar\u0131, \u00f6demeler, teslim konusunda ihtilaflar ya\u015fanmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamdaki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131n Yarg\u0131 mercileri \u00f6n\u00fcnde \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fclmesinde ispat kurallar\u0131 aktif rol oynamaktad\u0131r. Bu sebeple bu yaz\u0131m\u0131zda in\u015faat s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinden kaynaklanan hak ve alacaklar\u0131n belirlenmesinde kilit nokta olarak nitelendirilebilecek ispat kurallar\u0131na yer verilecektir. \u00d6rnek olarak y\u00fcklenici a\u00e7m\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu davada i\u015fi bitirdi\u011fini iddia ederek i\u015f sahibinden alacak talebinde bulunmaktad\u0131r. Eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinde kural olarak y\u00fcklenicinin i\u015f bedeline hak kazanabilmesi i\u00e7in eseri s\u00f6zle\u015fme ve ekleri, imar mevzuat\u0131, fen ve tekni\u011fine uygun olarak tamamlay\u0131p i\u015f sahibine teslim etmesi gerekir. Yarg\u0131tay \u00d6zel Dairesi, eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden kaynaklanan uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klarda y\u00fcklenicinin yapm\u0131\u015f […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":316,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[4],"tags":[35,37,33,34,36,38],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/ozmeric.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/315"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/ozmeric.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/ozmeric.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ozmeric.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ozmeric.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=315"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"http:\/\/ozmeric.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/315\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":319,"href":"http:\/\/ozmeric.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/315\/revisions\/319"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ozmeric.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/316"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/ozmeric.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=315"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ozmeric.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=315"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ozmeric.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=315"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}