{"id":428,"date":"2019-02-26T17:55:47","date_gmt":"2019-02-26T14:55:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ozmeric.av.tr\/?p=428"},"modified":"2019-02-26T17:59:19","modified_gmt":"2019-02-26T14:59:19","slug":"428franchise-sozlesmelerinin-sona-ermesi-halinde-rekabet-yasagi-haksiz-rekabet-portfoy-tazminati","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/ozmeric.av.tr\/index.php\/2019\/02\/26\/428franchise-sozlesmelerinin-sona-ermesi-halinde-rekabet-yasagi-haksiz-rekabet-portfoy-tazminati\/","title":{"rendered":"FRANCH\u0130SE S\u00d6ZLE\u015eMELER\u0130N\u0130N SONA ERMES\u0130 HAL\u0130NDE REKABET YASA\u011eI- HAKSIZ REKABET-PORTF\u00d6Y TAZM\u0130NATI"},"content":{"rendered":"

FRANCH\u0130SE S\u00d6ZLE\u015eMELER\u0130N\u0130N SONA ERMES\u0130 HAL\u0130NDE <\/strong><\/p>\n

REKABET YASA\u011eI- HAKSIZ REKABET-PORTF\u00d6Y TAZM\u0130NATI<\/strong><\/p>\n

Ocak 2019,<\/p>\n

Av.Merve Ay\u00e7e \u00d6ZMER\u0130\u00c7<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Uygulamada franchise s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinde, franchise alan \u015fah\u0131s\/firma aleyhine s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin sona ermesinden sonraki d\u00f6nemi kapsayan \u015fekilde ayn\u0131 veya benzer sekt\u00f6rde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmay\u0131 yasaklayan \u201crekabet yasa\u011f\u0131\u201d h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine yer verildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. S\u00f6zle\u015fmelerde rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenleyen i\u015f bu h\u00fck\u00fcmlere ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k halinde franchise alan aleyhine y\u00fcksek tutarlar\u0131 i\u00e7eren cezai \u015fart h\u00fck\u00fcmleri de \u00e7o\u011funlukla yer almaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Kural olarak s\u00f6zle\u015fme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve s\u00f6zle\u015fme ile ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131k (ahde vefa) esas olmakla beraber, baz\u0131 hallerde s\u00f6zle\u015fme h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin ge\u00e7ersizli\u011fi ve taraflar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 olmamas\u0131 s\u00f6z konusu olabilir. Nitekim s\u00f6zle\u015fmede yer alan rekabet ememe y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ili\u015fkin s\u00f6zle\u015fme maddeleri hakk\u0131nda Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n bu y\u00f6ndeki maddelerin ge\u00e7erli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131 bulunmaktad\u0131r. Yarg\u0131tay bu kararlar\u0131nda, s\u00f6zle\u015fme maddesinin ge\u00e7ersiz olmas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan T.C. Anayasas\u0131 ile d\u00fczenlenen \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma h\u00fcrriyetine ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k<\/em><\/strong> ve franchise alan\u0131n ekonomik ki\u015filik haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlali<\/em><\/strong> sebeplerine dayanmaktad\u0131r. Rekabet etmeme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc d\u00fczenleyen s\u00f6zle\u015fme maddelerinin ge\u00e7ersiz olmas\u0131 halinde bu maddeye ba\u011fl\u0131 cezai \u015fart d\u00fczenlemesinin ge\u00e7ersiz olaca\u011f\u0131 ve hukuken korunabilir nitelikte olmayaca\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay \u00d6zel Dairesi, s\u00f6zle\u015fme sonras\u0131 rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenleyen benzeri s\u00f6zle\u015fme h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011funu kararlar\u0131nda belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

\u201cDava, franchise s\u00f6zle\u015fmesine<\/u> ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k iddias\u0131na dayal\u0131 haks\u0131z rekabetin tespit ve \u00f6nlenmesi istemine ili\u015fkindir. Somut olayda, taraflar aras\u0131nda imzalanan 13.11.2007 tarihli s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin 5.5. maddesinde, alt imtiyaz sahibinin bu anla\u015fman\u0131n sona ermesini veya feshedilmesini takip eden bir y\u0131ll\u0131k s\u00fcre boyunca imtiyaz b\u00f6lgesinde, ne kendisinin ne de ilgili oldu\u011fu bir \u015firketinin bu anla\u015fma ile makul olarak tasarlanm\u0131\u015f bulunan i\u015f ile ayn\u0131 veya benzer olan i\u015flerde, \u00f6zelde de g\u0131da zinciri ile veya g\u0131da toptan veya perakende sat\u0131\u015f\u0131 yapan Dia \u00fcr\u00fcnlerinin benzerlerini veya ayn\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 satan rakip bir i\u015fletme ile i\u015f yapmaktan ve genelde de Dia i\u015fletmeleri ile rekabet yaratacak do\u011frudan veya dolayl\u0131 faaliyetlerde bulunmaktan ka\u00e7\u0131nmay\u0131 taahh\u00fct etti\u011fi<\/u> d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f olup, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan daval\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin feshinden sonra an\u0131lan maddede yasaklanan i\u015fleri yapmaya devam etti\u011fi ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclerek i\u015fbu dava a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olup, mahkemece yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7elerle davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir. Oysa, T\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti Anayasas\u0131\u2019n\u0131n \u00c7al\u0131\u015fma ve S\u00f6zle\u015fme H\u00fcrriyeti ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 48 ve devam\u0131 maddelerinde, herkesin diledi\u011fi alanda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma ve s\u00f6zle\u015fme h\u00fcrriyetine sahip oldu\u011fu bildirilmi\u015f, BK.\u2019nun 19. maddesinin ilk f\u0131kras\u0131nda, bir akdin mevzuunun kanunun g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi s\u0131n\u0131r dairesinde serbest\u00e7e tayin olunaca\u011f\u0131 belirtildikten sonra, 2. f\u0131kras\u0131nda bu serbestinin s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131 g\u00f6sterilmi\u015f, 20. maddesinde ise bir akdin mevzuunun gayri m\u00fcmk\u00fcn veya gayri muhik yahut ahlaka (adaba) mugayir olmas\u0131 halinde o akdin bat\u0131l olaca\u011f\u0131 d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin taraflar\u0131, s\u00f6zle\u015fme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ilkesi \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin konusunu belirlemekte \u00f6zg\u00fcr iseler de bu \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn s\u0131n\u0131rs\u0131z ve sonsuz oldu\u011fu s\u00f6ylenemez. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n ve BK.\u2019nun an\u0131lan h\u00fck\u00fcmleri s\u00f6zle\u015fme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7izmi\u015ftir. Bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalardan sonra somut olaya d\u00f6n\u00fclecek olursa, taraflar aras\u0131ndaki s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenleyen 5.5. maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fc, T\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti Anayasas\u0131 ile g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma h\u00fcrriyeti ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmas\u0131 ve taraflar\u0131n aralar\u0131nda imzalayacaklar\u0131 bir s\u00f6zle\u015fme h\u00fckm\u00fc ile bu \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ihlal anlam\u0131na gelecek her hangi bir d\u00fczenleme yapmalar\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulunmamas\u0131 nedeniyle ge\u00e7ersizdir.<\/u> Bu durum kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda mahkemece, dava konusu 13.11.2007 s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin 5.5. maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn, yukar\u0131da an\u0131lan yasal d\u00fczenleme ve ilkelere ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fundan ge\u00e7ersiz bulundu\u011fu kabul edilerek, taraflar aras\u0131ndaki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n, yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan \u015fekilde incelenip de\u011ferlendirilmesi ve sonucuna g\u00f6re bir karar verilmesi gerekirken, yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 do\u011fru olmam\u0131\u015f, karar\u0131n daval\u0131 yarar\u0131na bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir.\u201d (Yarg\u0131tay 11. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nin 19.1.2012 T. ve 2011\/13747 E., 2012\/356 K. Say\u0131l\u0131 Karar\u0131ndan al\u0131nt\u0131d\u0131r.)<\/em><\/p>\n

* * *<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201cDavac\u0131 vekili, m\u00fcvekkili \u015firketin … T\u00fcrkiye ile 22.11.2005 tarihli franchise s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi<\/u> imzalad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu kapsamda 16.10.2008 tarihli … m\u00fc\u015fteri temsilcili\u011fi s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi imzalayarak daval\u0131 ile \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yakla\u015f\u0131k bir y\u0131ldan beri civardaki gayrimenkullerle ilgili her t\u00fcrl\u00fc belgeye eri\u015febilen daval\u0131n\u0131n, edindi\u011fi t\u00fcm bilgileri, ayn\u0131 b\u00f6lgede ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z bir ofis a\u00e7mak suretiyle kendi yarar\u0131na kullanmaya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin 4.9. maddesinde s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin ge\u00e7erli oldu\u011fu s\u00fcre ile sona ermesinden itibaren iki y\u0131l i\u00e7erisinde m\u00fc\u015fteri temsilcisinin ayn\u0131 il\u00e7e s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131 i\u00e7inde benzer i\u015fi yapamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, aksi halde 20.000 USD cezai \u015fart \u00f6deyece\u011finin kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek<\/u>, an\u0131lan mebla\u011f\u0131n kur kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 olan 29.624 TL’nin dava tarihinden itibaren yasal faiziyle birlikte daval\u0131dan tahsilini talep ve dava etmi\u015ftir. Daval\u0131 vekili, davan\u0131n reddini istemi\u015ftir. Mahkemece, Dairemize ait 15.10.2012 tarihli ilama dayan\u0131larak, taraflar aras\u0131ndaki s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenleyen \u00f6zellikle s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin sona ermesinden sonraki 2 y\u0131la ili\u015fkin 4.9. maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn, Anayasa ile g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma h\u00fcrriyeti ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 ve taraflar\u0131n aralar\u0131nda imzalayacaklar\u0131 bir s\u00f6zle\u015fme h\u00fckm\u00fc ile bu \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ihlal anlam\u0131na gelecek herhangi bir d\u00fczenleme yapmalar\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulunmamas\u0131 nedeniyle ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011fu,<\/u> daval\u0131n\u0131n …’ya i\u015fyerini ta\u015f\u0131ma tarihinin, s\u00f6zle\u015fme s\u00fcresinin bitiminden sonra olmas\u0131 ve gazete ilanlar\u0131n\u0131n da dava tarihinden sonra olmas\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, davac\u0131n\u0131n bu nedenle cezai \u015fart isteyemeyece\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131, davac\u0131 vekili temyiz etmi\u015ftir.\u00a0 Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, mahkemece uyulan bozma karar\u0131 gere\u011fince h\u00fck\u00fcm verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131na ve delillerin takdirinde bir isabetsizlik bulunmamas\u0131na g\u00f6re, davac\u0131 vekilinin b\u00fct\u00fcn temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde de\u011fildir. SONU\u00c7: Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerden dolay\u0131, davac\u0131 vekilinin b\u00fct\u00fcn temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddiyle usul ve kanuna uygun bulunan h\u00fckm\u00fcn ONANMASINA..\u201d<\/em> (Yarg\u0131tay <\/em>11. Hukuk Dairesi \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a02013\/13428 E\u00a0, \u00a02014\/15075 K. karar\u0131ndan al\u0131nt\u0131d\u0131r.)<\/em><\/p>\n

* * *<\/em><\/p>\n

Yine Rekabetin Korunmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131ndaki Kanunun 4. maddesi uyar\u0131nca, \u00a0\u201cbelirli bir mal veya hizmet piyasas\u0131nda do\u011frudan veya dolayl\u0131 olarak rekabeti engelleme, bozma ya da k\u0131s\u0131tlama amac\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan veya bu etkiyi do\u011furan yahut do\u011furabilecek nitelikte olan te\u015febb\u00fcsler aras\u0131 anla\u015fmalar, uyumlu eylemler ve te\u015febb\u00fcs birliklerinin bu t\u00fcr karar ve eylemleri hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 ve yasakt\u0131r.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

Bununla beraber \u015fu hususu belirtmekte fayda vard\u0131r ki, s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin sona ermesinden itibaren, franchise alan\u0131n, franchise verene ait olan know-how\u2019undan (teknik bilgisinden) yararlanmak suretiyle bir gelir elde etmesi halinde T\u00fcrk Ticaret Kanunu md.55 vd. ile d\u00fczenlenen haks\u0131z rekabet h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re tazminat sorumlulu\u011fu s\u00f6z konusu olabilir. Nitekim s\u0131n\u0131rlay\u0131c\u0131 olmayan madde d\u00fczenlemesinde \u201cba\u015fkas\u0131n\u0131n mallar\u0131, i\u015f \u00fcr\u00fcnleri, faaliyetleri veya i\u015fleri ile kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmaya yol a\u00e7an \u00f6nlemler almak\u201d<\/em><\/strong> haks\u0131z rekabet hallerinden say\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu a\u015famada e\u011fer franchise verene ait bir marka, i\u015fletme bi\u00e7imi, i\u015fletmenin i\u00e7 mekan ve tasar\u0131m\u0131, i\u015fletmede kullan\u0131lan t\u00fcm malzeme, men\u00fc fiyat politikas\u0131, \u00fcr\u00fcn \u00e7e\u015fitleri, i\u015fletme tarz\u0131 vs. benzer bilgilerin kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 benzerlik yarat\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle faaliyetlere devam edilmesinin tazminat y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc do\u011furmas\u0131 s\u00f6z konusu olabilir.<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay 11. Hukuk Dairesi \u00a0\u00a0\u00a02015\/2370 E. \u00a0, \u00a02016\/796 K. karar\u0131ndan al\u0131nt\u0131d\u0131r:<\/em><\/strong> \u201cDavac\u0131 vekili, taraflar aras\u0131nda 21.09.2004 tarihli franchise s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi imzaland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daval\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcvekkiline ait ‘….’ ticari markas\u0131 kullanarak pup i\u015fletti\u011fini, s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin s\u00fcresinin 5 y\u0131l olarak tayin edildi\u011fini, s\u00fcrenin sona ermesine ra\u011fmen s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin z\u0131mnen yenilendi\u011fini, 2010 y\u0131l\u0131 Ocak ve \u015eubat ay\u0131 alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011funu, puplarda kullan\u0131lan markan\u0131n vazge\u00e7ilmez dekorasyonu ile konseptinin bulundu\u011funu, daval\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcvekkiline ait bu konsept ve dekorasyonu kullanarak ba\u015fka bir markayla pup i\u015fletti\u011finin tespit edildi\u011fini, bu kullan\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131n\u0131n istendi\u011fini, haks\u0131z kullan\u0131m\u0131n devam etti\u011fini, esasen s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin 13. maddesinde de 1 y\u0131l s\u00fcreli rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ileri s\u00fcrerek ve \u0131slah isteminde bulunarak, m\u00fcvekkilinin maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 haks\u0131z rekabetin men’i i\u00e7in daval\u0131 i\u015fletmenin an\u0131lan yerde 1 y\u0131l s\u00fcre ile benzer i\u015fletme i\u015fletmesinin men’ine, bakiye cari hesap alaca\u011f\u0131 1.550.84 TL ile 95.714.13 TL maddi ve 2.500 TL manevi tazminat\u0131n tahsiline karar verilmesini talep ve dava etmi\u015ftir.\u00a0 Daval\u0131 vekili, davada ticaret mahkemesinin g\u00f6revli oldu\u011funu, davac\u0131n\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin 5 y\u0131l sonunda sona erdi\u011fini, kendisine ait i\u015fyerinde dekorasyon ve tasar\u0131m de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi yaparak ‘….’ markas\u0131yla faaliyet g\u00f6sterdi\u011fini, rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa’ya ve Rekabetin Korunmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131ndaki Kanun h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 bulundu\u011funu savunarak, davan\u0131n reddini istemi\u015ftir. Mahkemece, bozma ilam\u0131na uyularak yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama ve dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re, daval\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin fiilen sona ermesinden itibaren ayn\u0131 i\u015fyerinde, ayn\u0131 konsept ve tasar\u0131m\u0131 kullanarak, davac\u0131n\u0131n verdi\u011fi ….’dan faydalanarak yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 faaliyetin haks\u0131z rekabet te\u015fkil etti\u011fi, maddi, manevi tazminat ve cari hesap alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tahsili gerekti\u011fi, <\/u>bozma ilam\u0131na g\u00f6re maddi tazminat\u0131n KDV ilave edilmeden hesapland\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle, davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne, 81.113,67 TL maddi, 1.550,84 TL bakiye s\u00f6zle\u015fme alaca\u011f\u0131 ve 2.500 TL manevi tazminat\u0131n tahsiline karar verilmi\u015ftir.\u00a0Karar\u0131, daval\u0131 vekili temyiz etmi\u015ftir. Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, mahkemece uyulan bozma karar\u0131 gere\u011fince h\u00fck\u00fcm verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131na ve delillerin takdirinde bir isabetsizlik bulunmamas\u0131na g\u00f6re, daval\u0131 vekilinin b\u00fct\u00fcn temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde de\u011fildir.SONU\u00c7: Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerden dolay\u0131, daval\u0131 vekilinin b\u00fct\u00fcn temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddiyle usul ve kanuna uygun bulunan h\u00fckm\u00fcn ONANMASINA,..\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

Bununla beraber, franchise s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin franchise alana kar\u015f\u0131 haks\u0131z olarak feshedilmesi halinde, franchise verenin edinmi\u015f oldu\u011fu m\u00fc\u015fteri \u00e7evresi sebebiyle portf\u00f6y tazminat\u0131 ile sorumlu tutulmas\u0131 g\u00fcndeme gelebilir. Bu a\u015famada franchise verenin s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin feshi y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki iradesin haks\u0131z oldu\u011funa kanaat edilmesi halinde, TTK md.122 vd uyar\u0131nca franchise verene kar\u015f\u0131 b\u0131rak\u0131lan m\u00fc\u015fteri \u00e7evresi dolay\u0131s\u0131yla uygun bir portf\u00f6y tazminat\u0131 talebinde bulunulabilir. (Yarg\u0131tay 11. Hukuk Dairesi\u00a02013\/18444 E., 2014\/10860 K. karar\u0131nda k\u0131smen yer verilmi\u015ftir.)<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

FRANCH\u0130SE S\u00d6ZLE\u015eMELER\u0130N\u0130N SONA ERMES\u0130 HAL\u0130NDE REKABET YASA\u011eI- HAKSIZ REKABET-PORTF\u00d6Y TAZM\u0130NATI Ocak 2019, Av.Merve Ay\u00e7e \u00d6ZMER\u0130\u00c7   Uygulamada franchise s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinde, franchise alan \u015fah\u0131s\/firma aleyhine s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin sona ermesinden sonraki d\u00f6nemi kapsayan \u015fekilde ayn\u0131 veya benzer sekt\u00f6rde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmay\u0131 yasaklayan \u201crekabet yasa\u011f\u0131\u201d h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine yer verildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. S\u00f6zle\u015fmelerde rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenleyen i\u015f bu h\u00fck\u00fcmlere ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k halinde franchise alan aleyhine y\u00fcksek tutarlar\u0131 i\u00e7eren cezai \u015fart h\u00fck\u00fcmleri de \u00e7o\u011funlukla yer almaktad\u0131r. Kural olarak s\u00f6zle\u015fme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve s\u00f6zle\u015fme ile ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131k (ahde vefa) esas olmakla beraber, baz\u0131 hallerde s\u00f6zle\u015fme h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin ge\u00e7ersizli\u011fi ve taraflar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 olmamas\u0131 s\u00f6z konusu olabilir. Nitekim s\u00f6zle\u015fmede yer alan rekabet ememe y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ili\u015fkin s\u00f6zle\u015fme maddeleri hakk\u0131nda Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n bu y\u00f6ndeki maddelerin ge\u00e7erli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131 bulunmaktad\u0131r. Yarg\u0131tay bu kararlar\u0131nda, s\u00f6zle\u015fme maddesinin ge\u00e7ersiz olmas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan T.C. Anayasas\u0131 ile d\u00fczenlenen \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma h\u00fcrriyetine ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k ve franchise alan\u0131n ekonomik ki\u015filik haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlali sebeplerine dayanmaktad\u0131r. Rekabet etmeme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc d\u00fczenleyen s\u00f6zle\u015fme maddelerinin ge\u00e7ersiz olmas\u0131 halinde bu maddeye ba\u011fl\u0131 cezai \u015fart d\u00fczenlemesinin ge\u00e7ersiz olaca\u011f\u0131 ve hukuken korunabilir nitelikte olmayaca\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Yarg\u0131tay \u00d6zel Dairesi, s\u00f6zle\u015fme sonras\u0131 rekabet yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenleyen benzeri s\u00f6zle\u015fme h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011funu kararlar\u0131nda belirtmi\u015ftir. \u201cDava, franchise s\u00f6zle\u015fmesine ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k iddias\u0131na dayal\u0131 haks\u0131z rekabetin tespit ve \u00f6nlenmesi istemine ili\u015fkindir. Somut olayda, taraflar aras\u0131nda imzalanan 13.11.2007 tarihli s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin 5.5. maddesinde, alt imtiyaz sahibinin bu anla\u015fman\u0131n […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":117,"featured_media":430,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1,4],"tags":[103,105,106,104,20],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/ozmeric.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/428"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/ozmeric.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/ozmeric.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ozmeric.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/117"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ozmeric.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=428"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/ozmeric.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/428\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":429,"href":"http:\/\/ozmeric.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/428\/revisions\/429"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ozmeric.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/430"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/ozmeric.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=428"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ozmeric.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=428"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ozmeric.av.tr\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=428"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}